The $1 Billion Lesson from Bill Ackman, the Legendary Fund Manager
Read time: 4 minutes || Read on web browser
Welcome to Mind Over Money, a weekly newsletter where I share actionable ideas to help you transform your relationship with money to build financial confidence and independence.
Today's topic: Confirmation bias + sunk cost fallacy
We tend to treat billionaires like financial demigods—too smart, too disciplined to make rookie mistakes. But even titans trip over their own egos.
Today’s story is a cautionary tale of Bill Ackman, the billionaire hedge fund manager who lost big.
In December 2012, Ackman took the stage at a packed Manhattan conference with a 334-slide presentation and a $1 billion conviction: Herbalife, the multilevel marketing giant selling nutrition shakes and supplements, was a pyramid scheme destined for collapse.
Ackman wasn’t just shorting the stock—he was mounting a crusade.
A short bet is a wager that a stock’s price will fall. Investors borrow shares, sell them, and plan to buy them back later at a lower price, pocketing the difference. If the price rises instead, losses can be unlimited. Ackman’s short was one of the largest ever made by an individual investor.
His conviction didn’t come out of nowhere. A few years earlier, he’d achieved Wall Street fame for correctly predicting the collapse of MBIA, a financial insurance firm that imploded during the 2008 crisis. That short earned him nearly $1 billion and a reputation as a brilliant contrarian—a man who could see risks invisible to everyone else.
So when investigative researcher Christine Richard, who had chronicled his MBIA success, called him with another potential fraud—Herbalife—Ackman saw déjà vu. Another corporate villain. Another chance to be the hero.
He spent $50 million gathering evidence, lobbying regulators, and convincing investors that Herbalife was doomed. He called it his moral mission.
Then the stock soared—fueled partly by rival billionaire Carl Icahn taking the opposite bet. The higher the price climbed, the more Ackman refused to back down.
For six years, he fought the market, regulators, and reality itself. The result: an estimated $760 million to $1 billion in direct losses, plus hundreds of millions more in carrying and lobbying costs.
Ackman didn’t lose because he misread Herbalife’s balance sheet. He lost because he misread himself. What happened had everything to do with the mind, not the market.
Two powerful cognitive biases—confirmation bias and the sunk cost fallacy—combined to trap one of Wall Street’s sharpest minds in one of its most expensive lessons. It’s a reminder that intelligence doesn’t protect us from bias. It often just makes our justifications sound smarter.
The Two Biases That Trapped Him
Confirmation Bias: The Belief That Wouldn’t Die
Ackman’s downfall began with a story he told himself—one that grew stronger the more the world contradicted it.
After his MBIA triumph, he began to see patterns everywhere: complex companies hiding fraud that only he could expose. So when Herbalife entered the picture, he saw his next crusade.
He poured millions into research to “prove” Herbalife was a pyramid scheme. But instead of objectively testing his hypothesis, he built an echo chamber around it. His team compiled a massive 334-slide presentation to convince others—but really, it was to convince himself.
When Herbalife’s stock rose instead of collapsing, Ackman doubled down. He launched PR campaigns, funded documentaries, and lobbied regulators—all efforts to confirm what he already believed. Each piece of supportive evidence became gospel; every contradiction became conspiracy.
Even when rival investor Carl Icahn publicly took the opposite bet and made nearly $1 billion in profits, Ackman didn’t reassess. He reframed reality: the market was wrong, regulators were slow, truth would prevail “eventually.”
That’s confirmation bias in action—the human tendency to seek, interpret, and remember information that confirms our existing beliefs, while filtering out anything that challenges them.
Ackman’s belief system became self-reinforcing. His identity as “the man who spots frauds” made him incapable of accepting that maybe, this time, there was no fraud to spot.
His loss was cognitive because he mistook conviction for truth. Yet even truth couldn’t compete with pride. And as the evidence mounted, another force kept him trapped: the sunk cost fallacy.
Sunk Cost Fallacy: When Walking Away Feels Harder Than Losing
By 2015, Wall Street was watching in disbelief as Ackman kept the fight alive. Each passing year cost him about $100 million in interest and fees. Yet, rather than cutting his losses, he stayed the course.
This is the sunk cost fallacy—our tendency to continue investing in a losing decision because we’ve already spent so much on it.
By then, Ackman’s reasoning wasn’t financial anymore; it was emotional. To quit would be to admit that six years of effort, $50 million in research, and an entire public crusade were for nothing. His ego, reputation, and moral identity were on the line.
Psychologically, the trap is predictable. Loss aversion made acknowledging defeat unbearable. Commitment bias made it hard to reverse a public stance. And the endowment effect made him overvalue the position simply because it was his.
The deeper his losses grew, the more “right” he needed to be to justify them. This escalation of commitment transformed a bad investment into a multi-year obsession.
By the time Ackman finally closed his position in 2018, Herbalife’s stock had more than doubled since his short began. The loss was compounded by the inability to emotionally disconnect from what was already gone.
It wasn’t inevitable, but once perspective is lost, losing money becomes only a matter of time. Ackman’s loss may have been spectacular, but the psychology behind it is painfully ordinary.
Five Ways to Outsmart the Biases
These two biases—confirmation bias and sunk cost fallacy—feed each other. One convinces you you’re right; the other convinces you it’s too late to admit you’re wrong. But both can be managed with structure and discipline.
1. Actively Seek Disconfirming Evidence
Before you invest—or double down—ask: What would prove me wrong? Create a “devil’s advocate” checklist for every major decision. Research the bear market case with the same rigor as the bull market case. Make it a habit to read contrarian opinions, not just affirming ones.
2. Set Predetermined Exit Rules
Decide in advance when you’ll walk away. Define price targets or performance triggers before emotions take over. Predetermined exit points turn reactive decisions into mechanical ones—and protect you from escalating losses.
3. Review Your Portfolio Like a Stranger
Every quarter, pretend you’re advising someone else. Would you buy the same investments again today, knowing what you know now? If not, that’s a sign to let go. Detachment is a skill.
4. Conduct Pre-Mortems on Big Bets
Before committing, imagine it’s one year later and the decision failed. What went wrong? What did you miss? This “failure rehearsal” weakens overconfidence and surfaces blind spots early.
5. Anchor Decisions to Goals, Not Ego
“Am I right?” is the wrong question. Instead, ask: “Does this move me closer to my goals?” Shifting focus from personal vindication to long-term outcomes keeps emotion from being hijacked.
Final Thoughts
Bill Ackman’s Herbalife bet will go down as one of Wall Street’s most infamous psychological blowups—because of his faulty mindset.
His confirmation bias blinded him to disconfirming evidence. His sunk cost fallacy chained him to a losing position.
In the end, he didn’t lose to Carl Icahn or to Herbalife. He lost to human nature. But the real lesson here is, even the smartest investors need systems that protect them from themselves.
So what should you do? Seek disconfirmation. Set exits in advance. Review decisions with detachment.
Conviction builds great investments, but humility keeps them alive.
p.s. This issue is the second of my Mind over Money series on investment psychology. If you missed the first issue, you can read it using the link below: